![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Dropping support for Win95/98/ME ? |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Creator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,623
![]() |
Hi all
I`m just seeing how many people would be affected if I dropped support for Windows 95/98/ME from future versions of TouchBuddy. A lot of the new stuff I want to add requires the use of shared memory, and sadly this only really works in Windows 2000 and above. The new code will be central to a lot of the new features, and it would create a lot of extra software bloat if I had to code around this on earlier windows versions, and in many cases, it wouldnt work at all. So, speak up if you are likely to be affected. I have a feeling that if I dont drop support for 95/98/ME, then lots of new features will just not be possible, and development will pretty much grind to a halt.
__________________
![]() ![]() (Setup: XP Pro, classic mode, LinITX 8" touchscreen (Client/Server), 19" touchscreen (Local), latest development version of TouchBuddy) |
|
|
|
| Re: Dropping support for Win95/98/ME ? |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Toolkit Creator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On your Six!
Posts: 1,913
![]() |
How about making this a Poll on what OS People are running? Or if they are moving to a new OS soon?
__________________
(a.k.a. Snacko) Touchscreen: Innovatek TM-868 8"; Running Local Mode on XP Pro ![]() |
|
|
|
| Re: Dropping support for Win95/98/ME ? |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Creator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,623
![]() |
I tried that before and the response was not so great. This way, if TB users reply, they get their voices heard. If they dont, then... well...
( And before anyone asks, no I wont be doing two versions, one "for all" and one "for win2000 and above" )
__________________
![]() ![]() (Setup: XP Pro, classic mode, LinITX 8" touchscreen (Client/Server), 19" touchscreen (Local), latest development version of TouchBuddy) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|